GLW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amphenol Corp. has a net margin of 11.46% compared to Corning, Inc.'s net margin of 20.26%. Corning, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.07% beat Amphenol Corp.'s return on equity of 35.69%.

Corning, Inc. has a consensus price target of $95.92, signalling upside risk potential of 1.03%. On the other hand Amphenol Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $159.10 which suggests that it could grow by 2.27%. Given that Amphenol Corp. has higher upside potential than Corning, Inc., analysts believe Amphenol Corp. is more attractive than Corning, Inc..

Corning, Inc. has a beta of 1.131, which suggesting that the stock is 13.065% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amphenol Corp. has a beta of 1.207, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.682%.

Corning, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Amphenol Corp. offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Corning, Inc. pays 192.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol Corp. pays out 28.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Corning, Inc.'s is not.

Corning, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than Amphenol Corp. quarterly revenues of $6.2B. Corning, Inc.'s net income of $470M is lower than Amphenol Corp.'s net income of $1.3B. Notably, Corning, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 60.21x while Amphenol Corp.'s PE ratio is 51.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning, Inc. is 5.51x versus 9.44x for Amphenol Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ciena Corp. has a net margin of 11.46% compared to Corning, Inc.'s net margin of 1.44%. Corning, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.07% beat Ciena Corp.'s return on equity of 4.44%.

Corning, Inc. has a consensus price target of $95.92, signalling upside risk potential of 1.03%. On the other hand Ciena Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $237.13 which suggests that it could grow by 2.11%. Given that Ciena Corp. has higher upside potential than Corning, Inc., analysts believe Ciena Corp. is more attractive than Corning, Inc..

Corning, Inc. has a beta of 1.131, which suggesting that the stock is 13.065% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ciena Corp. has a beta of 1.133, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.3%.

Corning, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Ciena Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corning, Inc. pays 192.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Ciena Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Corning, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than Ciena Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Corning, Inc.'s net income of $470M is higher than Ciena Corp.'s net income of $19.5M. Notably, Corning, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 60.21x while Ciena Corp.'s PE ratio is 273.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning, Inc. is 5.51x versus 7.07x for Ciena Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA Corp. has a net margin of 11.46% compared to Corning, Inc.'s net margin of 55.98%. Corning, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.07% beat NVIDIA Corp.'s return on equity of 110.69%.

Corning, Inc. has a consensus price target of $95.92, signalling upside risk potential of 1.03%. On the other hand NVIDIA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $253.19 which suggests that it could grow by 35.78%. Given that NVIDIA Corp. has higher upside potential than Corning, Inc., analysts believe NVIDIA Corp. is more attractive than Corning, Inc..

Corning, Inc. has a beta of 1.131, which suggesting that the stock is 13.065% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA Corp. has a beta of 2.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 131.494%.

Corning, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. NVIDIA Corp. offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Corning, Inc. pays 192.34% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA Corp. pays out 1.16% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Corning, Inc.'s is not.

Corning, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are smaller than NVIDIA Corp. quarterly revenues of $57B. Corning, Inc.'s net income of $470M is lower than NVIDIA Corp.'s net income of $31.9B. Notably, Corning, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 60.21x while NVIDIA Corp.'s PE ratio is 46.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning, Inc. is 5.51x versus 24.49x for NVIDIA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VisionChina Media, Inc. has a net margin of 11.46% compared to Corning, Inc.'s net margin of --. Corning, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.07% beat VisionChina Media, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Corning, Inc. has a consensus price target of $95.92, signalling upside risk potential of 1.03%. On the other hand VisionChina Media, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Corning, Inc. has higher upside potential than VisionChina Media, Inc., analysts believe Corning, Inc. is more attractive than VisionChina Media, Inc..

Corning, Inc. has a beta of 1.131, which suggesting that the stock is 13.065% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VisionChina Media, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Corning, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. VisionChina Media, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corning, Inc. pays 192.34% of its earnings as a dividend. VisionChina Media, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Corning, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.1B, which are larger than VisionChina Media, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Corning, Inc.'s net income of $470M is higher than VisionChina Media, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Corning, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 60.21x while VisionChina Media, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corning, Inc. is 5.51x versus -- for VisionChina Media, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.